NEWSROOM |
|
|
|
|||
|
||||
November 17, 2009
- Back in April 2009, the NTSB called on the FAA to ground the Zodiac
CH-601XL after the Safety Board linked six accidents involving that
aircraft model to aerodynamic flutter, a phenomenon in which the control
surfaces and wings of the airplane can suddenly oscillate and lead to
catastrophic structural failure. Those accidents killed a total of ten people. Preliminary investigation of the November 6 accident in An experimental airplane of the same series that the National Transportation Safety Board urged the Federal Aviation Administration to ground seven months ago, until a flight control problem could be corrected, was involved in another fatal accident last week. |
||||
On November 6, 2009, a Zodiac CH-601XL, an experimental amateur-built
airplane, was destroyed as a result of an in- flight breakup near
The
Safety Board's urgent recommendation to the FAA was to "prohibit
further flight of the Zodiac CH-601XL, both special light sport aircraft
and experimental, until such time that the FAA determines that the
CH-601XL has adequate protection from flutter." The FAA replied in July
that they lacked "adequate justification to take immediate certificate
action to ground the entire fleet."
The Zodiac is available as a ready-to-purchase airplane (classified as a
special light sport aircraft), which is manufactured by Aircraft
Manufacturing and Design, LLC, and as an amateur-built plane from a kit
(classified as an experimental aircraft) available from the designer,
Zenith Aircraft Company.
On November 7, one day after the accident in |
The designer,
Zenith Aircraft Company, has asked the owners of the kit-built
experimental airplanes to make the same modifications, but there is no
requirement that the modifications be completed before further flight is
attempted.
"We are pleased that the FAA and the manufacturer have acted on the
safety-of-flight issues that we identified with the Zodiac special light
sport airplane. We are troubled, however, that no modifications are
required on the amateur-built planes," said NTSB Chairman Deborah A.P.
Hersman. "We are very concerned that a lack of required compliance may
lead to more accidents like the one in
NTSB on April 14, 2009, issued an urgent safety recommendation to the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in which it asked the agency to
prohibit further flight of a type of a small airplane that has been
involved in six in-flight structural breakups since 2006.
The recommendations apply to the Zodiac CH-601XL, a low-wing,
fixed-gear, single- engine, two-seat general aviation airplane designed
by Zenair, Inc. In its urgent safety recommendation, the Board cited
four accidents in the
The CH-601XL was certified as a Special Light Sport Aircraft (S-LSA) by
the FAA in 2005. This type of certification does not require that the
FAA approve the airplane?s design. Instead, the airplane model is issued
an airworthiness certificate if the manufacturer asserts that the plane
meets industry accepted design standards and has passed a series ground
and flight tests.
The Safety Board?s urgent recommendation to the FAA is to prohibit
further flight of the Zodiac CH-601XL until they can determine that the
airplane is no longer susceptible to aerodynamic flutter. The
Safety Board?s investigations of the accidents that occurred in the
?The NTSB does not often recommend that all airplanes of a particular
type be prohibited from further flight,? said NTSB Acting Chairman Mark
V. Rosenker. ?In this case, we believe such action will save
lives. Unless the safety issues with this particular Zodiac model are
addressed, we are likely to see more accidents in which pilots and
passengers are killed in airplanes that they believed were safe to fly.?
In addition, problems with the airspeed indication system were
identified. Errors with the correlation between the actual
airspeed of the airplane and that shown on the instruments in the
cockpit could result in the airplane being piloted at airspeeds
exceeding design limits, which could compromise the plane?s structural
integrity. While the airspeed indication issue has not been linked to
any accidents, the Safety Board believes that this is a safety-of-flight
issue that should be corrected.
The date, location and circumstances of the six accidents the Board
cited in which the CH-601XL suffered in-flight structural failures are
as follows: On February 8, 2006, near
In addition to the urgent recommendation to the FAA on prohibiting
further flight of the Zodiac CH 601XL, the Safety Board issued the
following seven additional recommendations to the FAA: 1) make a
comprehensive evaluation of the wing and aileron system on the Zodiac CH
601XL to identify design and/or operational changes that will reduce the
potential for flutter; 2) notify owners of Zodiac CH-601XLs of any
design and/or operational changes to the CH 601XL and require them to
implement the changes; 3) work with ASTM International to incorporate
standards for light sport airplanes that would reduce the likelihood of
encountering in-flight flutter; 4) evaluate the stick force gradient at
the aft center of gravity and especially at the higher Gs, and
notify pilots of such effects; 5) develop standards on stick force
characteristics for light sport airplanes that minimize the possibility
of pilot?s inadvertently over-controlling the airplane; 6) ensure that
the pilot?s airspeed indicator accurately reflects the Plane?s velocity
and update pilot operating handbooks (POHs) accordingly; and 7) work
with ASTM International to ensure standards for light sport airplanes
result in accurate airspeed indications and appropriate documentation in
new airplane pilot operating handbooks. The Board?s investigations have identified several areas in which the design standards for light sport airplanes were deficient. ASTM International provides the standards that are developed by industry working groups. The NTSB has asked the ATSM to take the following actions: 1) Add requirements to ensure the standards for light sport airplanes reduce the potential for aerodynamic flutter to develop; 2) develop standards on stick force characteristics for light sport airplanes that minimize the possibility of pilot?s inadvertently over-controlling the airplane; and 3) ensure standards for light sport airplanes result in accurate airspeed indications and appropriate documentation in new airplane pilot operating handbooks. |
?AvStop Online Magazine Contact Us Return To News |