DOT Denies Requests for Waiver of Tarmac Delay Rule <


Bookmark and Share


DOT Denies Requests for Waiver of Tarmac Delay Rule

By Mike Mitchell

April 23, 2010 - The U.S. Department of Transportation today denied the requests of five airlines for a temporary exemption from the new rule limiting tarmac delays.  As a result, all U.S. carrier flights covered by the rule will be subject to its terms effective April 29. 

“Passengers on flights delayed on the tarmac have a right to know they will not be held aboard a plane indefinitely,” U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said.  “This is an important consumer protection, and we believe it should take effect as planned.” 

The tarmac delay provision was part of a new airline passenger protection rule, issued last December, that prohibits U.S. airlines operating domestic flights from permitting an aircraft to remain on the tarmac at large and medium hub airports for more than three hours without deplaning passengers.  Exceptions were allowed only for safety or security reasons or if air traffic control advises the pilot in command that returning to the terminal would disrupt airport operations.  

On March 4, JetBlue Airways asked for an exemption from the rule for its operations at New York’s JFK Airport until that airport’s main runway, currently under construction, reopens on Dec. 1.  That request was followed by similar requests by Delta Air Lines and American Airlines for their operations at JFK, by Continental Airlines for their flights at New York LaGuardia Airport and Newark International Airport, and by US Airways for Philadelphia International Airport.  The carriers argued that, without the requested exemption, large numbers of flights will have to be canceled at the New York area airports and affected passengers will face significant inconveniences and delays before being accommodated. 

 In denying the requests, the Department concluded that airlines could minimize tarmac delays by rerouting or rescheduling flights at JFK to allow the airport’s other three runways to absorb the extra traffic.   The Department also noted that it has the ability to take into account the impact of the runway closure and the harm to consumers when deciding whether to pursue enforcement action for failure to comply with the rule and the amount of a fine, if any, to seek as a result of non-compliance.
 ©AvStop Online Magazine                                                                 Contact Us                                                  Return To News                                          Bookmark and Share


AvStop Aviation News and Resource Online Magazine

Grab this Headline Animator