|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||
By Daniel Baxter |
||||
October 19, 2010 -
U.S. Department of Transportation Office of Inspector General reports
the FAA is making progress in implementing ADS-B at limited locations
and working with airspace users to refine the use of the new technology.
However, the FAA’s plans to deploy ADS-B throughout the National
Airspace System (NAS) and realize expected benefits face significant
risks and challenges. The greatest risks to successfully implementing ADS-B are airspace users’ reluctance to purchase and install new avionics for their aircraft and the FAA’s ability to define requirements for the more advanced capabilities. Users have raised justifiable concerns about evolving requirements and uncertain equipage costs and benefits. For example, based on the FAA’s analysis, the costs for users to equip with ADS-B avionics could range from $2.5 billion to $6.2 billion. |
||||
|
||||
While the FAA is
planning to mandate equipage for “ADS-B Out” by 2020, it plans to
initially provide ADS-B surveillance information that essentially
replicates existing domestic radar coverage, resulting in few new
benefits to airspace users. Most new capabilities and benefits, such as
enhancing airspace capacity, rely on “ADS-B In” and the display of
information in the cockpit.
In addition to
implementation issues that may delay deployment, risks within FAA’s
acquisition and contract approach for ADS-B could also increase the
overall program cost. Specifically, while FAA’s contract includes
controls and analytical tools to measure progress with cost and schedule
baselines, the FAA did not conduct a comprehensive financial analysis
before deciding that a service-based contract would save the Government
more money than the traditional method of owning and operating the
system.
In fact, only months after it briefed Congress that this approach would save the Government $821 million, the FAA revised its estimated cost savings to $628 million. The FAA’s data show that if the Agency had owned the system through the first phase of ADS-B (establishing ground infrastructure), the Government could have saved over $600 million in that phase alone. FAA officials acknowledge that the analysis used to justify the service-based approach and cost savings was flawed but asserted that over the long term, the cost-benefit equation changes in favor of the contractor owning and operating the system. |
Yet, FAA has not
updated its cost and benefit analysis to support the service-based
approach. The FAA will also pay the contractor over $1 billion for
broadcast services—before airspace users are required to equip in 2020
and congested airports see significant delay reductions. The contractor
will be paid regardless of whether important efforts, such as modifying
controller displays, remain on track. Moreover, there are unresolved
questions with the contract that could increase the cost of the ADS-B
ground system.
For example, the
contract does not have specific estimates for providing ADS-B In
services to aircraft that will rely on different broadcast frequencies.
Unless FAA addresses these concerns, the larger risk of minimal return
on Federal investment and indefinite delays in achieving NextGen goals
remains. We are making recommendations to help the FAA reduce risk with
ADS-B implementation and enhance contract oversight.
However
requirements and costs for ADS-B In may not be mature for at least 2
years. The FAA also has yet to fully define requirements for modifying
its existing automation systems that will display ADS-B information to
controllers. Problems with integrating ADS-B on displays at the initial
operating sites indicate this will be a significant challenge to
nationwide deployment. Until the FAA effectively addresses these
uncertainties associated with equipage and requirements for ADS-B’s
advanced capabilities, progress with ADS-B will be limited, and the
potential for cost increases, delays, and performance shortfalls will
continue.
In addition to
implementation issues that may delay deployment, risks within the FAA’s
acquisition and contract approach for ADS-B could also increase the
overall program cost. Specifically, while the FAA’s contract includes
controls and analytical tools to measure progress with cost and schedule
baselines, the FAA did not conduct a comprehensive financial analysis
before deciding that a service-based contract would save the Government
more money than the traditional method of owning and operating the
system.
According to FAA,
ADS-B will supplement and ultimately replace ground-based radar because
an ADS-B-equipped aircraft can provide controllers and pilots in other
aircraft with faster updates of important flight information (e.g.,
aircraft identification, position, altitude, direction, and speed).
|
|
Other News Stories |
©AvStop Online Magazine Contact Us Return To News |
|